Discuss a time when you’ve seen one of the seven deadly flaws of carrots
and sticks in action. What lessons might you or others learn from the
experience?
Daniel Pink’s book Drive: The Surprising
Truth About What Motivates Us, points out that
extrinsic motivators (carrots and sticks) sometimes back-fire and actually
decrease commitment to a task. This is
very important for today’s leaders to know because extrinsic motivators significantly
drive what we do. The lesson I will take
from this book is that extrinsic motivators are not all bad when reserved to
more routine tasks. In chapter 2, Pink
describes seven deadly flaws of carrots and sticks that can:
1.
extinguish intrinsic motivation
2.
diminish performance
3.
crush creativity
4.
crowd out good behavior
5.
encourage cheating, shortcuts,
and unethical behavior
6.
become addictive
7.
foster short-term thinking
I have witnessed the diminishing of
performance as a result of paying a stipend to a school leadership
team. Members of the leadership team are
paid for being part of the leadership team and supporting the
administration set forth the direction of the school. In this example, I witnessed the team’s
performance diminish claiming they already do a lot of their additional work on
their own time and will need more money for added meetings outside the workday. Thus, the group cannot meet on a
regular basis, and have not been able to perform at an optimum level.
Have you seen instances when carrots and sticks have been effective?
Ironically, I have seen the same
instance work in the opposite direction with another leadership team. These
individuals were also paid a stipend however, they had to apply for the
position and go through a rigorous interview process. Once selected for the position they were given
the autonomy to become the “administrators” for their grade-levels. Every year they had to reapply. Many of the teacher leaders in this school
moved on to become successful principals.
As
you think about your own best work, what aspect of autonomy has been most
important to you? Autonomy over what you do (task), when you do it (time), how
you do it (technique), or with whom you do it (team)? Why? How much autonomy do
you have at work right now? Is it enough?
When I look at my best work and
the aspect of autonomy that has been important to me I have found that having
the autonomy to select whom I work with has been the most beneficial. Selecting the group or individual that I want
to work with affords me the opportunity to take advantage of the trust
factor.
No comments:
Post a Comment